Teams | Collaboration | Customer Service | Project Management

If you’re evaluating secure team messaging software, chances are a security audit exposed gaps in your current platform, new compliance requirements have raised concerns, or your organization simply needs stronger protection for sensitive conversations. The challenge is that almost every messaging platform claims to be secure. But the level of encryption they offer varies. Many encrypt data in transit (if they provide encryption at all).

Ask anyone why they use WhatsApp for work and the answer is almost always the same: everyone's already on it. That's true. WhatsApp has over two billion users worldwide. It's fast, familiar, and free. When you need to reach an external partner quickly, or coordinate with a colleague outside your usual tools, it's the path of least resistance.

In many enterprises, communication is fragmented across multiple tools. Employees move between email, Microsoft Teams or Slack, WhatsApp groups, video conferencing platforms, file-sharing applications, and in some cases even legacy phone systems just to complete everyday work. Usually, because no single tool provides secure communication across multiple formats. For security and compliance teams, this creates a difficult challenge.

In many enterprises, communication is fragmented across multiple tools. Employees move between email, Microsoft Teams or Slack, WhatsApp groups, video conferencing platforms, file-sharing applications, and in some cases even legacy phone systems just to complete everyday work. Usually, because no single tool provides secure communication across multiple formats. Are you evaluating enterprise messaging platforms for your organization?

Collaboration tools allow teams to coordinate projects, share information, respond to incidents, and make decisions. But most of these tools aren't secure. As cyber threats increase, employees use consumer messaging apps for work, and regulations such as GDPR, NIS2, and DORA raise compliance expectations, organizations need collaboration tools that protect sensitive communications without slowing teams down.

Most enterprise video conferencing platforms claim to be encrypted. The problem is that encryption can mean very different things depending on how a platform is built. For organizations discussing sensitive business, legal, financial, or operational information over video calls, a secure video conferencing platform is crucial. But many platforms advertise security while still retaining the ability to access call content through their infrastructure.

Enterprises are rethinking their communication infrastructure due to growing concerns about vendor lock-in, US cloud jurisdiction, cyberattacks targeting collaboration systems, stricter compliance requirements, and growing pressure around AI and data governance. Open source communication platforms have become part of the solution because they offer greater visibility, deployment control, and infrastructure independence.

If you manage IT infrastructure for an organization that handles sensitive files, regulated data, or complex collaboration workflows, you've likely wrestled with a familiar set of tensions: keeping data under your control while enabling cloud-scale flexibility, enforcing compliance without creating friction for users, and maintaining a clear audit trail across a sprawling document environment.

The collaboration brings together two established European platforms: Pexip’s secure video conferencing and interoperability infrastructure, and Wire’s MLS-based end-to-end encrypted messaging and collaboration platform. Together, the companies will explore how tightly integrated video and messaging can be deployed within sovereign environments, aligned with the operational and regulatory requirements of government, defense, and critical infrastructure.

Digital collaboration has become the default way of working across business and government. Messaging, file sharing and real-time coordination are now central to how organizations operate. Yet for a long time, classified communication followed a very different path. For VS-NfD and similar classifications, secure communication traditionally relied on tools designed for a much earlier digital era. Phone calls, basic text messaging and highly constrained systems were often the only approved options.